Disney's Delusional Design to Destroy Humanity (A Beyond Mythos Thesis)

Written By Kelly K

Disclaimer: Everything below is a mix of what I observed and heard during the event. The goal isn’t to pinpoint "who exactly said what," but to share (usually) an outsider's view and overall perspective on these industries. I’m not here to act as a definitive firsthand source—readers should do their own research. I hope this inspires you to attend events, explore new industries, and hear what leaders are presenting. These notes combine my observations with thoughts on how things could run smoother and how ideas connect (IMO). I’m not an expert, you know? Just hanging out in the room with them. Enjoy.

RATINGS: Venue (5/5), Food (5/5), Speaker Content (5/5), Networking (3/5), Likeliness to Return (5/5)

〰️

RATINGS: Venue (5/5), Food (5/5), Speaker Content (5/5), Networking (3/5), Likeliness to Return (5/5) 〰️

For this blog, I want to breakdown one of the pieces of DD that my friend on twitter/x: @Beyond-Mythos has written about a company I’ve been a huge non-fan of for the past few years: Disney. It’s funny cause my grandpa (who was - for a few years, apparently) part of the CIA! Yes. I hardly write about that much, but I talked about it on a podcast before. How I know very little of what he did, he was only in it in his 20’s apparently… and then left and went into investment banking… It’s why I’ve grown up in a home that has stock/investments - at least on the side - and have been more curious into adulthood… ever since I learned the CIA isn’t actually so amazing. My grandpa was a nice guy. I knew him sorta well. But, now I’m like WTF IS THE CIA!?!?!?

  • BUT he gave me Disney shares when I was still a young kid. They were $10 when I got them, then I sold them a few years ago when I learned how corrupt Disney was… and the more I learn it gets worse.

  • My guess was that he thought it was a sweet company (as do most of us) and had heard that it was gonna be around for a while, from his friends - and his observations of Disney. PLUS he always loved movies (and even had a blog reviewing movies… although the woman in his picture is my STEP mom - not even a direct bloodline family member… but, whatever. Here we go: https://matineeidle.blogspot.com/) - Even in one blog he writes that he thought anyone who doesn’t believe that 9/11 was real is a conspiracy theorist. But he’s up in heaven or by my side as part of my spirit team, here with me, realizing it was 100% an inside job and a demolition. A cruel demolition.

Why Attend/Write: I’ve never written a blog quite like this before, but I feel like it’s extremely relevant to my goals/missions - it relates to kids’ education, systems, global manipulation… everything I talk about and am interested in. So let’s read through it together and then I’ll comment throughout it in pink/purple.

Photo Collage and Commentary:


HIS DD: https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2070468474430759089

  • Let’s begin

The Pukesharter Origin Story: A look inside Disney and the evil Oracle of Omaha's psychopath mind

None of what I wrote before felt so hard to write. Indeed, it's rather a horror story, super subjective and thus purely fictional since I might be very wrong making those assumption.

Especially the last chapter. If they turn out to be right, it shows how dark Warren Buffett really is and gives a glimpse on what might have happened in the last 60 years.

If I should be wrong, I owe Warren a big apology - that's for sure!

Topics:

  • Warren Buffett's Purpose: Minimize Civilization

  • The Easiest Job: Persuasion instead of Innovation

  • Disney as an persuasion tool for Warren's purpose?

  • The classic Disney movies are dominated by FORCE levels on the Scale of Consciousness and switch roughly 2003

  • Seeing The Lion King through the Persuasion filter, aligned with Warren's purpose

  • Walt's lung cancer death What this all means - the really dark thoughts section

Warren Buffett's Purpose: Minimize Civilization

  • In 1964 Warren Buffett together with his then wife Susan Thompson Buffett established the Buffett Foundation specifically "centered on stopping that [population] growth, both domestically and abroad" (https://philanthropyroundtable.org/almanac/buffett-billions-for-abortion/).

    • WHAT???? “centered on stopping population growth domestically and abroad? How the heck did they market this? HOW is WB so popular and loved when he’s so evil. So many people - it’s wild. They just keep us busy and trusting hte news…. :( and media and pop culture reference. Product placement is everywhere to sway thoughts on a grand scale level.

    • And if you say this you sound crazy to hte people who are so brainwashed.

In 1988 Susan said that "her husband was attracted to giving for population control because he liked seeing statistics on falling national birth rates"(https://capitalresearch.org/article/warren-buffett-a-wealthy-philanthropist-with-some-bad-ideas/).

  • This quote sounds unreal, huh? Here are some other wild quotes from this article (and btw how did this DD writer find/have the time to read these articles originally?)

    • Each year Buffett auctions off a lunch with him that supports the Glide Foundation, the nonprofit of a San Francisco church that is so far to the left that it refuses to accept donations of used clothes, on the grounds that second-hand clothes demean the homeless

      • used clothes demean? Lol okay - well everything I wear is demeaning apparently.

    • (The foundation) would conduct what he referred to as ‘foundation rapings’ when he was gone.

    • “Only at Berkshire Hathaway can you get a job by paying $5 million for an interview,” Buffett biographer Alice Schroeder told the Financial Times.

Until 2006 the Buffett's major spending went to birth control, family planning, abortion access, and population-related work. Making them the biggest donors in this area with milestones like:

  • Establishment of Dedicated Philanthropic Vehicle for Population Control (1964)

  • Early Grants Supporting Abortion Rights and Family Planning Organizations (starting ~1989)

  • Support for Development and Introduction of the Abortion Pill (RU-486 / Mifepristone) (1990s)

  • Funding for Abortion Equipment and Services in Developing Countries (1999 onward)

  • Large-Scale Funding for Abortion Access, Training, and Services (2001 onward, major acceleration post-2006)

  • Major Push for IUD Research, Access, and Promotion (2007 onward)

  • Development of Low-Cost Hormonal IUD for Global Use (2008 onward)

  • Sustained Global Family Planning Funding via Key Organizations (2000s onward, with large grants from 2008)

In June 2006 Buffett announced he would give the vast majority of his fortune (then ~$30 billion in Berkshire stock) primarily to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

  • We already saw that the Gates Foundation has strong ties to the Boston Consulting Group (BCG, see: https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2040759682864734222) and nowonder Bill and his wife Melinda agree with Warren.

    • This article covers how companies essentially always die once BCG shows up - and yet they get away with it over and over again with one of the best consulting reputations on earth.

In 2010 Bill Gates said "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, [and] reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15%".

  • I’ve been hearing lately that the world population is a psychop - especially in China. So this just makes me think: how could we ever even know. Is this just a narrative to scare people and get them in this “survival” mindset.

May 4, 2002 Warren said at the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting that he thinks the Earth's carrying capacity is finite, we have to reduce the population and that "[i]t’s much better to prevent population growth than to try and correct afterwards."

  • Gross. What a classic comment to make in a room full of wealthy people.

It is unclear to me if Warren really believes the carrying capacity to be a problem or if he just hates humanity and uses the "carrying capacity" as a persuasive justification for his actions. One possible lens for such a consistent, decades long focus is a psychopathic disorder caused by childhood trauma (https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2044325086853808549, "

Why did Warren Buffett create those shadow monopolies? (A hypothesis)"). (Clinical psychopathy is a specific diagnosis with no public supporting evidence here.)

Additionally, we find that neither Warren nor Bill Gates ever build something beautiful in my opinion.

  • This is so true. I mean, in the limited sense that I arrived to Seattle and was blown away by how kinda trashy and mediocre it was compared to what I’d seen in Shanghai. I thought FOR SURE hte home of BILL GATES + Amazon (given my understanding of them like 6 years ago before I learned all of this.. their PR is that they love earth, nature, etc) and yet… it was so mediocre and underutilized and just like unappreciated here. The nature, the streets, the roads, the city. Just like, such potential.

  • Plus, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has a huge gallery on - TOILETS all over the world? Its so weird.

Looking at the Pukesharter they created, I think J.R.R Tolkien said it best that "evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good."

  • That’s a nice quote. Kinda makes me want to cry.

It looks like Warren's purpose is to minimize the population and that "[i]t’s much better to prevent population growth than to try and correct afterwards".

[Hypothesis] #1 Warren Buffett's purpose in life is to minimize civilization.

The Easiest Job: Persuasion instead of Innovation

Roughly in 2003 the author of Influence (1984), Robert Cialdini received a share of Berkshire stock and a letter per mail, saying "[...] Warren and I [Charlie Munger] have read your books, we’ve made hundreds of millions of dollars. This is our way of saying thanks" (http://mastersinvest.com/newblog/2018/5/18/the-munger-series-learning-from-robert-cialdini).

We already hypothesized how Warren Buffett used persuasion for his reputation (see https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2037115351352107160), to get people to buy Walmart stock while shorting it (https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2031718876006736162)

  • This is so wild to me - and yet, not surprising… and just wild how SO much corruption and manipulation happens in plain sight. But the powers that be just keep everyone too busy and distracted. I mean, even this blog is lengthy - all of my blogs. Who makes the time?

And how Patrick “Naked Short Slayer” Byrne was Buffett’s distraction while Overstock laundered Kmart fire-sale & tunneled travel business (https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2037567012713431237)

  • Bro that stinks. I so badly want to be a HUGE fan of Patrick Byrne.

or distracting from the Warren-Dot-Gates Bubble (commonly "Dot-Com Bubble", https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2056734992961520018).

Warren persuaded people of eBay when auctioning his private charity lunch there since 2003 (see https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2056734985608908831).

  • Ohhhh is eBay a part of this (and why Ryan Cohen won’t let go of it. Finally he found something - along with GameStop) to grab onto, shake, save, and flip the tables once and for all?

We also can hypothesis from this that Warren likes indirect control and therefore build the Pukesharter as his shadow monopoly.

  • Dude when you hear about him this way, its like - he’s worse than Hitler. And has so many fetishes like power indirectly, etc. Manipulation.

[Hypothesis] #2 Warren Buffett build his shadow monopoly Pukesharter to gain control while avoid a visible monopoly and without being associated with the companies potential failures (or harmful actions). We also know that Warren just loves the easy job instead of the long way (see https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2044325086853808549).

  • Right? He said that working hard is perverse? LOL. insane.

What happens if we combine those two? We get an hypothesis: [Hypothesis] #3 Warren Buffett builds companies based on persuasion, not on great products and innovation.

  • This is, of course, an interpretive hypothesis.

Berkshire’s consumer holdings have performed well financially, and many observers attribute their success to strong brands rather than a coordinated persuasion strategy.

If we search for companies that fit those criteria we arrive at e.g. Coca-Cola, Tupperware, Mary Kay, Pampered Chef, Scentsy, QVC and Amway.

  • Coca-Cola is a major investment by Berkshire.

Super unhealthy, also due to its high sugar, which might help toMinimize Civilization**.

  • THIS makes sense too, just jumping to conclusions. You just wonder WHY THE HECK do these guys push the most unhealthy foods at healthy events and vise versa. It’s twisted.

  • And why does unhealthy food always get put into kids’ shows and media. (Like how 90% of movies have alcohol in them, etc)

"I believe I had my first Coca-Cola in either 1935 or 1936. Of a certainty, it was in 1936 that I started buying Cokes at the rate of six for 25 cents from Buffett & Son, the family grocery store, to sell around the neighborhood for 5 cents each." (https://berkshirehathaway.com/letters/1989.html)

Berkshire acquired the Pampered Chef in 2002 (https://berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2002pdf.pdf).

On the board of Tupperware, its products being plastic food retention boxes, was Catherine A. Bertini since 2005, who was also Senior Fellow for Agricultural Development at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation from 2007 to 2009.

Interestingly, Tupperware products contained BPA up to 2010 which could play a role in reproductive cancers (2007, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/223813/cdc_223813_DS1.pdf) which might help to Minimize Civilization.

  • OMG no way :( ahhhhhhhh

And you probably shouldn't put later versions of Tupperware in your microwave (see https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/civilengfacpub/article/1291/viewcontent/Hussain_EST_2023_Assessing_the_Release_of_Microplastics__MS_FINAL.pdf).

This brings us to Disney, a company famous for innovative, family-friendly storytelling.

  • and famous for their underground tunnels. Their cruise ships where they traffic kids to islands. To host real-life Hunger Games. And filling their movies with pedophilic and child-sacrificing symbolism.

How does it fit (or not fit) the persuasion-over-innovation pattern we’ve been exploring?

Disney as an persuasion tool for Warren's purpose?

First, you might say that Warren Buffett only held Disney for roughly a year ('66-'67, Buffett being 36 years, see https://berkshirehathaway.com/letters/1995.html) and said in 1998 that selling it was a huge mistake (https://buffett.cnbc.com/video/1998/05/04/afternoon-session---1998-berkshire-hathaway-annual-meeting.html?&start=2892&end=3141, "17.").

Well, following hypothesis #2 we know Warren doesn't like to be associated with some companies. Some former Disney executives later took prominent roles at other companies (sometimes called ‘corporate termites’ in this analysis, e.g. see https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2064708807175872596: Whitman/Bourguignon to eBay; Mather to Google; Steinberg to GameStop).

  • Yayyy! GameStop!

  • Oh and I remember when lots of people in the tech industry were complaining about how it was getting shitty a few years ago - at one of hte first events I ever attended- and then I was thinking, hmmm are there BCG people working for Google? But maybe its just one step above that: Warren Buffett People. Uugh.

Whether this represents coordinated movement or normal executive mobility is open to interpretation.

When being in my teens I remember the realization that Disney had a theme of dying parents (Bambi, The Fox and the Hound, The Lion King, Tarzan) and that the thought of loosing my parents really scared me.

  • YES!!! EVERY MOVIE IS ABOUT DYING PARENTS, being separated from parents, kids on their own, parents who can’t get to kids, like misfit kids being forced to be friends. So much shit. :(

At the time I rationalized it was supposed to make me stronger.

  • But what if this in fact wasn't the true goal?

  • Uugh this makes me want to cry already/again.

Given Hypothesis #2 (preference for indirect control and avoiding visible association), and knowing Disney films often feature parental loss, one could explore whether these stories might have had unintended (or, in a speculative hypothesis, intentional) effects on children’s emotional development.

  • Holy crap!! An effect on children’s emotional development??? :(

However, there is no evidence connecting Buffett’s brief shareholding to Disney’s creative decisions. But what if we for example see The Lion King through the persuasion filter and interpret it aligned with Warren's purpose? What if Disney's movies had the intent to traumatize children and ingrain persuasive messages in this early childhood ages?

  • wow. maybe. Intended traumatizing.

  • And I think a lot of movies are made with the intention of entertaining captured kids between being abused. When you start to look at kids shows through that lense SO MANY LINE UP

    • AND THIS IS WHY I WANT TO MAKE KIDS’ MEDIA THAT IS NOT TRAUMATIZING AND PEACEFUL AND EMPOWERING.

Therefore I let grok rate the traumatizing potential of Disney movies.

[Figure 1: Disney Movies Traumatizing Potential (Foundation Era 1937-2024) - made by grok]

We can see that the traumatizing potential grew very high during the second world war (Bambi 1942 - mothers death, Dumbo 1941 - separation).

Many American children had fathers away at war or killed in combat. We might retroactively interpret these films as helping kids process loss and separation.

What follows is an era with way less traumatizing movies until the 1980s the parental loss trauma theme began to come back with Fox and the Hound, peaking in The Lion King and later Up.

The classic Disney movies are dominated by FORCE levels on the Scale of Consciousness and switch roughly 2003

  • What are FORCE levels on the sale of consciousness? “The "Force vs. Power" model is a logarithmic scale of human consciousness (0 to 1000) created by Dr. David Hawkins in his book Power vs. Force. It divides states into reactive "Force" (lower vibrational energy that drains life) and proactive "Power" (higher energy that supports life). [1, 2,3]”

In line we find three studies: Cox, M., Garrett, E., & Graham, J. A. (2005): Death in Disney Films: Implications for Children's Understanding of Death - (https://web.archive.org/web/20170811084353/https://sites.ualberta.ca/~jennyy/PDFs/16913954.pdf); e.g. "[Explicit deaths] can be viewed as a positive point because these scenes demonstrate real, explicit deaths of characters to whom the viewer has developed an attachment. However, this can be potentially traumatic for some children [...]" Graham, J. A., Yuhas, H., & Roman, J. L. (2018): Death and Coping Mechanisms in Animated Disney Movies: A Content Analysis of Disney Films (1937–2003) and Disney/Pixar Films (2003–2016)

  • omg so sad.

(https://researchgate.net/publication/358699350_Analyzing_Hidden_Elements_in_Disney_Movies_and_Effects_on_Children); "[...] parental guidance is essential to make the children pick the proper lesson. The hidden themes and concepts in the Disney movies are stereotyping, sexual content, jealousy and escape." Siddique, Z., Pasha, S. A., & Ali, S.

While these academic studies examine emotional and psychological effects, the mapping onto FORCE vs POWER levels comes from applying David R. Hawkins’ consciousness framework (which is not part of the original research).

Looking at the studies they also found that the most triggered emotions are fear, grief, unrealistic expectations and potential short-term emotional distress from classic death/loss scenes.

  • Sadddddd.

  • Bro and these low-level feelings make me think of the theories of aliens and that non-human beings are running this world and feed off of our low energy. And negative feelings. In a 4th dimension. This really relates to that.

All of this is on the FORCE level. In casual discussions, many people tend to highlight the positive messages (resilience, family, personal growth), while academic analyses often focus more on the emotional challenges depicted.

  • Yeah, right??? Why even go there - why can’t movies and TV be realistic happy.

  • And then what the movies are nonstop stressful and traumatic - but then happy endings in teh end so no one can say anything. Its bullshit.

However, papers also note potential benefits (helping children understand death).

Overall, the classic films lean heavy into FORCE and only post-2003 films trend toward POWER, a higher consciousness calibration.

This timing aligns with academic research that specifically compared pre-2003 Disney films with post-2003 Disney/Pixar productions (Graham, Yuhas & Roman, 2018).

Why is that?

We’ll explore the parental loss theme in more depth later, but first let’s consider why depictions appear to become less intensely traumatic in films released after 2020.

* Why did Disney switch from FORCE to POWER levels in the last 1-2 decades? If Warren uses Disney as persuasion tool we might form the hypothesis that he is also pushing the woke mindset and probably the flood of an incompatible religion into the western world.

  • Ohhh right? Yeah there is so much “pride” and stuff pushed into every show.

He would then use Disney to prepare this flood and push rather an "everyone matters / be friendly / cooperation across differences", inclusion mindset, right?

  • Right. Even aliens/evil beings. Suicidal empathy.

[Hypothesis] #4 Disney is used as persuasion tool to push an everyone matters / be friendly mindset.

[Hypothesis] #5 The everyone matters / be friendly (woke) mindset to more easily flood the western world with Islam.

  • Yes.

[Figure 2: Disney Movies: Positive "Everyone Matters / Be Friendly" Messaging (Foundation Era 1937-2024) - made by grok]

And indeed, beginning with Lilo & Stitch in the early 2000s/2010s we see a shift to this mindset.

  • BRAH but I’m convinced Lilo & Stitch is a true story (MY BLOG ON THAT: https://medium.com/@kellytutors/we-birth-pre-aged-mice-to-solve-aging-814a541042eb) - ANDDD LOOK ITS TALKING ABOUT ACCEPTING ALIENS, and the event I went to on aging where they said that cloning has been aroudn forever and they do get Stich-like mice from time to time cloning AND THE FUCKING MOVIE IS ABOUT SECRET AGENTS TRYING TO TAKE AWAY LILO!! ITS A SUPER SAD MOVIE AND INSANE WHNE YOU WATCH IT AGAIN - but oh yeah, btw, everyone get along and love everyone - I HATE HTAT MOVIE> ITS HORRIBLE.

For example Zootopia shows kids how natural enemies (fox and rabbit) work together and gets even more extreme with Zootopia 2 where snakes are the good guys and are falsely blamed to be evil.

  • HOLY CRAP no! really???? And the rabbit symbolism tooo, like adrenochrome. Yeah its such a dumb movie. I hate that movie and all of these!!! Now I’m getting worked up hahaha. :(

Do you know the meme "don't be racist, let in the Orcs"? Exactly!

Again, this post costs me so much energy to write, unlike my other posts... I feel manipulated in a very evil way even from my very childhood on. And until now I didn't even realize it. Thankfully, chances are I might end in a nuthouse - not sure what's better.

  • Bro, been there, done that. It’s better to be on the outside - but it’s also great to speak up. Don’t let fear takeover. Be strong, be brave, speak up - share this. I’m glad it was written.

While it would be super interesting to talk about every movie, we'll focus on The Lion King and see it through the persuasion filter.

Seeing The Lion King through the Persuasion filter, aligned with Warren's purpose

While The Lion King is widely celebrated as a story about responsibility, family legacy, and personal growth, an alternative reading through a persuasion lens could interpret certain elements differently.

  • It’s the number one theater play ever, ongoing. Plus - the musician? Elton John.

It got pushed so hard, for example it's as far as I know the only musical that got an own island in Hamburg (Germany) and is playing there ever since.

Act 1 (Setup & Trauma):

  • Simba is born into privilege and legacy.

  • His father Mufasa teaches responsibility ("Remember who you are").

  • Scar's betrayal and Mufasa's death create deep guilt and trauma around family/legacy.

  • Persuasive effect (hypothetical): Associates early family expectations and reproduction with pain, guilt, and loss.

  • Viewers emotionally link "having kids/legacy" with potential tragedy.

    • Woah. Interesting and brainwashingggg!

Act 2 (Escape & Freedom):

  • Simba flees to the jungle and adopts "Hakuna Matata" with Timon and Pumbaa.

  • No worries, no responsibilities, live for today, eat bugs, avoid the past.

  • This is the emotional peak of carefree living.

  • The song became a massive cultural hit.

  • Persuasive effect: Glorifies a child-free or delayed-adulthood lifestyle.

  • wow.

  • "Hakuna Matata" = permission to opt out of traditional family/parental duties.

    • Woah. Truee………. :( wild

  • The visuals are bright, colorful, and fun - strong positive emotional anchoring.

Act 3 (Return & "Responsible" Balance):

  • Wait, you forgot that the childhood friend/woman shows up, “seduces him,” reminds him of everyone there and then like gets him to come back - idk that all gets left out. There must be soething here. And how his friends make fun of him for caring about a girl or something? idk.

  • Simba returns, defeats Scar, and restores the Pride Lands.

  • The land was dying because Scar allowed the hyenas to overpopulate and overconsume.

  • Possible persuasive interpretation: Frames over-reproduction as destructive.

    • Right.

  • The barren landscape vs. restored lush savanna creates powerful visual contrast.

Through the story we can derive the messages: Carefree, responsibility-free living is joyful and liberating (Hakuna Matata phase).

Family/legacy can come with heavy emotional costs and trauma.

Overpopulation or rapid/unbalanced growth leads to environmental and societal collapse.

True maturity and heroism involve restoring balance rather than maximizing reproduction.

Personal growth and self-discovery should come before (or instead of) early family formation.

  • WOWWWW so fucking truee!!! ahhh omg its so subtle but serious - AND BEING SHOWN TO CHILDRENNNNNN AHHH IN THEIR FORMATIVE YEARS :( uughhhhh.

Now, maybe this is a wrong view. And to be fair, these are interpretative readings, the movie is widely seen as pro-family, pro-legacy, for all ages.

  • But what if at least some percentage of kids actually subconsciously get this message this way and have less kids?

  • If that were true, of course Warren Buffett wouldn't want to be associated with Disney and rather implemented a shadow control structure before divesting.

"[Warren] was attracted to giving for population control because he liked seeing statistics on falling national birth rates" - 1988, Susan Buffett.

I think Disney could have had an impact on falling birth rates alongside abortion rights, the pill, IUD and massive amounts of (shorting) money.

Not only nationally.

[Hypothesis] #6 Disney is a tool to Minimize Civilization, first by parental loss trauma, causing less births and later by spreading the woke mind virus

To get more positive, let us see the potential in all this shit. Imagine a Golden Age where our children don't get traumatized but learn true critical thinking with cumulative evidence, free speech, all they need and a bright, golden vision of the future!

  • Yes 100% I agree :( sounds amazing please please hahah. like please can this happen now.

I hate to do it, but I want to talk quickly about Walt's death.

Walt's lung cancer death Warren Buffet invested in 1966 and divested in 1967.

November 1966 Walt had a check-up for his neck injury in the 1930s from a crushed neck vertebrae with lifelong chronic pain and arthritis.

During this check up lung cancer was diagnosed.

He underwent surgery shortly after and died just 3-4 weeks later on December 15, 1966 at the age of 65. And granted, even this extreme rapid course is said to be consistent with advanced lung cancer at diagnosis in that period.

But why do I keep cumulating cancer and other rather unlikely deaths for successful founders/executives?

Steve Jobs (Apple, age 56 October 5, 2011; Laurene's picture together with Maxwell, his doctor having "unnecessary" excess deaths later, see https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2034942480634778023 "* The end?") Roberto Goizueta (Coca-Cola, age 65, October 18, 1997; pancreatic tumor) Liam McGee (Coca-Cola, age 60, February 13, 2015; cancer) Roy E. Disney (Disney, age 79 after a year-long battle with stomach cancer, December 16, 2009)

Some notable deaths I'll maybe write about another time

After the Walt's death (who was the visionary) Ron O. Disney became chairmen, Ron W. Miller (Walt Disney's son-in-law joined the board in 1966 and Roy E. Disney (Walt's nephew) in 1967. The official cause was acute circulatory collapse caused by lung cancer. [...]

What this all means - the really dark thoughts section

The hypothesis we build are so unbelievable... glad nearly nobody reads my post anyways:

  • NOOOO people need to wake up!! It’s like the dodo birds!!! (but also no one reads my posts either hahahah :( )

[Hypothesis] #1 Warren Buffett's purpose in life is to minimize civilization.

[Hypothesis] #2 Warren Buffett build his shadow monopoly Pukesharter to gain control while avoid a visible monopoly and without being associated with the companies potential failures (or harmful actions).

[Hypothesis] #3: Warren Buffett build companies based on persuasion, not on great products and innovation.

[Hypothesis] #4 Disney is used as persuasion tool to push an everyone matters / be friendly mindset.

[Hypothesis] #5 The everyone matters / be friendly (woke) mindset to more easily flood the western world with Islam.

[Hypothesis] #6 Disney is a tool to Minimize Civilization, first by parental loss trauma, causing less births and later by spreading the woke mind virus

Also, while I wrote Warren Buffett here, we should not forget that the Pukesharter consists of many, many circles which are driven by FORCE-based incentives in zero sum games.

Some are found in The Giving Pledge.

If Warren's goal ever was to Minimize Civilization** and we saw in the first chapter what he did in the visible for everybody, we can arrive at the hypothesis that he didn't build the shadow monopolies for financial gains but to pursue exactly the goal to Minimize Civilization.

  • We'll put on a really, really dark filter and think through what this could - in a really, really dark world - mean (super speculatively, just as horror story): Sugar See's Candies (1972) and Coca-Cola (1988) Sugar, next to Omega-6, low cholesterol, low fat and process chemicals seem to be the primary major reason for why our health is so bad while our healthcare costs are so high (see https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/life-expectancy-vs-health-expenditure) compared to countries like Italy and Japan (low processed food) to Germany or US (high processed food).

Warren could have pushed sugar early directly through those two companies and later more comprehensively for all food. He probably didn't only use his government influence to gain information, alter short-selling rules and suppress anti-competitive scrutiny (https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2064708807175872596, "*

  • Government Employees "Insurance" Company hypothesis (GE"I"CO)") but also to suppress healthcare regulations, allowing unhealthy food and materials. Walmart and food ('70s / '80s), McDonalds (1990)

What if Warren didn't build Walmart in the shadows (see https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2029485065210617974) to maximize his economic profit, but influence our food (and other) supply chain.

  • Dude he is truly lazy. But if he thinks working hard is perverse, he msut literally have an opposite mindset to (idk) normal humans? Like he is on a literal hardcore mission to destroy humanity - in the way I want to help. Its so confusing???? How does he have this evil, evil, mindset - and he must get along so well with Bill Gates cause they both want the same thing and see that in each other.

  • Like how you can get along so well with someone when you agree on so much that is niche.

  • Wow, makes me want to rewatch Warren Buffett’s cartoon for kids. YOu know? uugh.

What if Warren did push Omega-6 mainly through seed oils since the '70s but figured it would be easier with a monopoly in place? Omega-6, next sugar and low fat which seems so devastating to our health (https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2063997561208217806) and surely contributes bigly to *Minimize Civilization**.

In 1990 McDonalds switched to seed oils for their fat, to be fair Warren did invest first in 1994 - so it wasn't him - or?

Due to high omega-6 the skin burns faster from the sun -> sunscreen necessary -> some major sunscreen were found to include cancer causing substances

  • Yeah, I boycotten suncreen a while back and don’t let my daughter wear it.

Automobile parts (~1995) Why are Tesla's easily the safest vehicles on the planet, while being cost competitive? What if Warren through his automobile replacement parts shadow monopoly (see AutoZone DD: https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2029202770687889612) made sure parts are inferior? Rather causing accidents? ICE cars - media push against EVs (~2000s/2010s)

  • What if next to the incumbents "protecting their legacy business", Warren just wants more ICE cars around because exhausts lead to more deaths than EVs zero emissions?

How could in roughly 2018 all media (state and private) push a combined message "you'll burn in an EV" - while factually wrong, not only in the US but also in Europe?

  • and you’ll burn if you don’t wear sunscreen. And sunglasses propoganda etc (i also boycotten sunglasses)

Aligned like "a thread to our democracy" messages.

Pharma through the Gates Foundation (2006), Berkshire (2020)

What better to *Minimize Civilization** than to turn against humanity what was originally supposed to help? What if vaccines cause more illness than they cure? What if the covid mRNA vaccines are primarily causing infertility? What if Warren and Bill Gates became experts in cancer, just not in curing but causing it (we talked above about Tupperware)? What if targeted turbo cancer was a thing?

  • yeah I think that some of the cancer research centers are for this purpose. Evne locally. How they brag that “less thatn 5 pills per person feels like a relief” - uug. . I take NO MEDICINE each day regularly. And growing up I was ALWAYS on so many meds. So many medicines pushed on me. :(. Brainwashing.

Remember, Warren likes to see the population numbers going down. We should probably also look into the Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (University of Nebraska Medical Center), dedicated in 2017.

Energy supply (~2010/2020) Why did Germany shut down all nuclear power plants but leave coal plants running, while pledging to do everything against climate change and coal plants being the worst? Well, probably the same as ICE cars above - they pollute the air and lead to many more deaths, also they are the reason we find so much mercury in tuna.

Apple AirPods with 100mW (2016) Apple launched the AirPods in 2016, "Wireless headphones, like Apple’s popular AirPods, could be dangerous to human health, according to a petition signed by 250 scientists" (https://x.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1582074957206806528).

They were among the first in that power class with ~100 meter range, while prior in ear headphones would have 2.5mW or less (50x less) and still have a reach of roughly 10 meter. [...]

We could probably go on, but I won't today and just ask one more question: why did our living costs go up so much and what did it cause?

I talked about the costs of the easy job here (https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2044325086853808549), caused mainly by Corporate Termites serving three major purposes: signaling, tunneling and fraud breeding function (https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2058070538086412561).

  • Corporate termites is a good phrase

But I think there is one more: increase compliance or negligence to decisions which lead to minimizing civilization.

  • DEI hires cause more accidents and won't probably care as hard for healthy instead of harmful substances.

Warren and Bill tried to make us all dumb and poor while killing us. With high costs of living you can't afford healthy food, you can't afford many things that bring you joy, you'll suffer more.

Mental suffering might cause physical suffering and at least the whish to having less kids, which would be killed by climate change nevertheless. We'll stop with those dark thoughts for today.

Now you know why only Elon builds a Rave Cave and why everything that is fun gets super expensive or shuts down.

  • Well and the studies on how the only places that adults go that look like childhood are alcohol/drug prone. Clubs, raves, bars - they all have colorful things and remind you of childhood :(. Adults and kids need a break. EVERYONE

Can someone wake me up please? However, if those hypotheses and examples are true, it once again outlines how extremely powerful the Pukesharter became and on the other hand how easy it should be to create a Golden Age which is just so much better (see: https://x.com/beyond_mythos/status/2069355326604792075). With a society not longer being pushed into FORCE levels and extinction. I can't wait!

What we owe the future - Second Thoughts: what are the most important and pressing problems?

Topics: What we owe the future

Most important and pressing problems Some examples to think about and to add to One of my picks MOASS can assist us to solve those problems

What we owe the future I immediately read "what we owe the future" by William MacAskill when it was released in August 2022, loved the concepts and the book as a whole.

Long-termism is just an awesome mindset, as well as the authors advise to allocate your time, as your most valuable resource, for topics were few work on and where you can make a bigger difference.

For those who haven't read it - you should. In short, the book argues moral equality between future generations and people alive today - it reads easy but can you feel the pain when trying to accept it? -, that humanity's future could span trillions of years with vastly more lives than everyone who lived in the past and that our actions now can shape whether that future is flourishing or catastrophic.

Oh boy. It so reflects at least my view of the Golden Age meaning not less than preventing extinction, avoiding civilizational collapse or stagnation by implementing positive values to steer towards a vast, flourishing future. A state of sustainable abundance. I think I came at least a little bit.

After just having experienced the insane covid mind virus massacre, implanting fear and division, I read the book with partly tears in my eyes (don't tell anybody!)

And here comes the thing I think we as a whole need to think more about. Most important and pressing problems What are the most important and pressing problems where few (successfully) work on today? While the book as well as the website 80,000 hours lists things as engineered pandemics, bioweapons, (nuclear) war, misaligned AI, global governance, fossil fuel depletion and stagnation, I began to wonder more and more if there aren't other currently not sufficiently handled problems, that if not solved timely will not even let get us get close to those risks.

Additionally, if our perception of the risk equals the actual risk or if it is sort of valetudinarian. For example, do you think the covid virus (as an engineered pandemic) was the bigger problem or rather how* humans handled it?

Most people I know would lean to the first (as of today). We may have different opinions and views. And to make this clear, I am not aiming to convince someone of one problem being more important than another one, rather to hopefully make you think about the question: What are the most important and pressing problems where few (successfully) work on today?

Having recently read Power vs Force and having been equipped with the map of consciousness I feel like together with cumulative evidence those are awesome tools to assess answers to this question and their current state.

Some examples to think about and to add to

To start I will give you some very rough examples I am thinking about. They are not in a prioritized order.

  • Elevating consciousness above 200 on an individual level, from force to power (see map of consciousness from Power vs Force, which divides in basic needs and protection > philanthropy, education, truth seeking, community & positivity, personal calibration and amplifying high-calibration media; you'll find links to the below problems)

  • Population decline due to low birth rates (you all know what to do , ok ok, it needs political, economical and cultural support too - one shouldn't have less because one has children and also having to excuse when entering a restaurant with children sucks).

  • Mass immigration of destructive religions (see: the parasitic mind - a great and entertaining book by the awesome Gad Saad)

  • Parasitic idea pathogens/Woke ideology (same as above)

  • Division of the people

  • Censorship (I am beyond grateful we got X - maybe some remember my reddit censorship dd at the time)

  • Overregulation

  • Corrupt (financial) markets

  • Overpaid executives, consultants and politicians

  • Dispossession by governments and companies ...

  • BTW I’m still here, just agreeing with all of this, enjoying the read, and also stunned.

Again, this is not a complete list, not prioritized and you can well have other opinions.

Like the WEF has for example. There are certainly different ways to tackle each of the problems as well as different hurdles.

If you run into a corrupt government (the only institution with the means of legal violence) it might be not possible to solve an issue without changing the government first.

I would love if you decide to join a conversation about any of those problems.

One of my picks

While my pleasure certainly lies in fixing the population decline , I also chose some more. The book was a big impulse for me to get more into activist investing. Especially after initial research when I figured out that information, like stories or books and activist activity itself receded massively over the last two decades and corporates seemed to be rather than not in a very sub optimal, controlled environment, shockingly through every imaginable dimension (operative, governance, regulatory, political,...).

When I found that even nobody was writing about (partly obvious) inefficiencies cough* in companies, I decided to to just that. To me it seemed like a topic were few work on and I could make a difference sometime, somehow.

The first step would be to learn by reading a lot and gather first hand experience. This wasn't easy always, because I could partly understand the incentives, also of owners and their story and partly it is just disgusting and hardly to understand for me.

This lead to sharing part of what I found and creating the X community "Activist Investor Market DD" (https://x.com/i/communities/1815368353172557836) in mid 2024.

Its just one of the in my opinion most important, pressing problems were yet too few seem to work on. Fixing companies. * MOASS can assist us to solve those problems

As I wrote in a former post, in my opinion (MOASS) money itself won't change shit.

  • Many good people had a lot of money over the last decades.

Why did those problems still occur? It seems to me getting oneself and as many as we can into the power level, above the force level is the single most important thing to do.

Longtermism is a logical consequence of this state. If we can achieve this, we, united, together, with a shitload of money and all those awesome people working on the Golden Age, continuing to mentor us, can solve all of the above problems. There really is a bright future ahead! A future of Power. A Golden Age. Love you.

What we owe the future - Third Thoughts: my wish list draft for the Golden Age‍ ‍

Topics:

** Introduction *

* The Cleanup *

* The Future

** Introduction Never would I have thought that I could live in a simulation, the one the Pukesharter hypothesis describes (my personal working speculative).

Even more unlikely that I would figure it out - well, still, chances are I might just end up in a nuthouse.

However, if that hypothesis ends up being right, there should be a set of actions to massively improve our current and future state. History then would be wrong since 1960/1970. A long, long time. MOASS, taken individually without anything else could be attributed to desire and pride, below the POWER level (see David R. Hawkins's Power vs Force). Going a step further, the current system eats everybody working for it in the end - no matter how much money you'll get.

When I wrote I would be rather poor living in a Golden Age than rich living in the current world I absolutely meant that.

Thus, MOASS above the FORCE-level would imply our civilization on the POWER level.

Resulting in prosperity for everyone in the absence of the Pukesharter Hasuhgaaay, its shadow monopoly and The Shitball.

Following is a first draft on the actions that would lead to this. It's far from complete, tries to stay rather abstract to serve as a structure and based on my current beliefs - which might be wrong and change over time.

I invite discussion and all your thoughts. Points market with "+" are part of the Heritage plan or otherwise well known. I structured the points along 1. The Cleanup and than 2. The Future.

While every point and their order is debatable, the last one in itself is not.

Happy to hear your thoughts.

** The Cleanup‍ ‍

* get rid of the Pukesharter moat (the hypothetical reason this takes so long and is so hard)

* demolish Pukesharter's high-risk foreign entanglements that provide asymmetric power to the hypothesized network, probably Iran and something more [hypothesis]

* end the death-bringer network [hypothesis, e.g. doctors deliberately harming patients]

* undercut reciprocal elite pacts [hypothesis]

+ end the Border and Immigration Chaos (https://heritage.org/priorities/border-and-immigration)

* focus healthcare on increasing healthiness and longevity, instead of a reduction

+ MAHA

* end health issues ("wrong food", vaccines, cancer causing,...)

* end government capture

+ DOGE / Root Out the Deep State (https://heritage.org/priorities/deep-state)

+ Ensure Election Integrity (https://heritage.org/priorities/election-integrity)

* change incentive structure from force-based to power-based

* implement owner operator structure

* ensure personnel is chosen merit-based

* get rid of Corporate Termites and Hollowmen (government, education, corporate,...)

* return ownership to the people, not institutions

* change incentive measurement form extinction based metrics (like low population growth and derivatives like carbon footprint) to growth based (like real wage growth, high productivity, high fertility rate, low cost-of-living, ...)

* ban short-selling as it is FORCE-based

* establish a free and fair market (get rid of shadow monopoly structure to allow innovation and reduce costs) + Unleash American Energy (https://heritage.org/priorities/american-energy)

* supply chain independence through localization

+ Counter China: make domestic supply chain independent (https://heritage.org/priorities/china)

* remove pure signaling and fraud functions at entities (see http://x.com/i/status/2058070538086412561), ensure only value adding functions are kept

+ Eliminate Regulation, Inflation, and Spending (https://heritage.org/priorities/regulation-inflation-and-spending)

+ Restore Digital Sovereignty (https://heritage.org/priorities/digital-sovereignty)

* renew education and research organizations to be truth seeking (like in progress with US food guidelines '25-'30), correct obviously wrong truths and align legislation accordingly

+ Expand Education Freedom (https://heritage.org/priorities/education-freedom)

* teach cumulative evidence and persuasion

* combat the mind virus on every dimension (education, corporate, regulation, humor,...)

* End the population collapse

+ Put Family First (https://heritage.org/priorities/family)

* make families great again

  • i like this one (hahha omg i have so little to write right now cuase I just agree with all of this and am in awe)

+ Prioritizing strong families and empowering local communities. This often ties into traditional values, restoring what they see as the foundation of society, and related social policies.

** The Future‍ ‍

* extend on everything above and implement risk mitigations to avoid FORCE driven capture (see David R. Hawkins)

* cultural/positive vision: beyond "combat"-active promotion of family, community, excellence, and curiosity. Those should drive fertility and resilience.

+ moon base, mars and beyond

  • bro, except the theories that the moon is already inhabited, its not natural, there are beings living on there, and its a base. I listen to a podcast where they talk about this a lot.

* nutrition/agriculture reform of the complete supply chain

* switch from mass production to local(?), biological, grass fed agriculture

  • love this

* get rid of intermediaries which are often non-value-adding (like banks or platforms)

  • love this

* radically incentivize innovation (in education, business, every sector!)

* implement "the algorithm" (question every requirement, delete any part or process you can, simplify and optimize, accelerate cycle time, automate)

* Incentivize breaking comfort zones and combat risk aversion

* much more

* make @beyond_mythos a US citizen

  • Yay! Hahah. Let’s make america great again. Beyond_mythos has amazing ideas and I agree with basically all of them if not all of them. Wild.

  • Wild. I want to process all of this for a while and then come back to add to it later. I’m grateful to have met someone who understands all this moass stuff (better than me) but is also really working hard to think about the future and how to fix things - not only just “lambos and blah blah” like so many MOASS people do. Though of course many also are really passionate about solving thngs.

  • geeze. I’m speechless for now.

Kelly K
Next

Real Time Shadowbanned by LinkedIn as They Teach Audiences to Grow Their Audience